News - Page 2 of 5 - Original Free Nations

Reconciliation 1
- federal Indian law
- November 14, 2020
I reckon that reconciliation is a clever trap word a trick of the mind a language technique now used all the time a deft move on the Chess Board of Life so we’ll fail to see what the powers that be want to keep out of sight and out of the light reconciliation has a
READ MORE
Let’s Examine the Category Indigenous 0
- federal Indian law
- November 13, 2020
We begin with the entirety of a People that is living in a particular geographical space, with its language, culture, traditions, and economic patterns. They are original to that space in relation to any other people that arrives later; Suddenly, a second invading People violently enters, or breaks into, that same geographical space and claims
READ MORE
Divine Land Grants 0
- federal Indian law
- October 22, 2020
by Paul Gilk “The disclosure of a myth is deemed academic as long as the myth belongs to somebody else. Recognizing one’s own myth is always much more difficult, if not down right dangerous.”-The Lost Gospel by Burton L. Mack, page 237. As a modestly long-time reader of Washington Report on Middle East Affairs—in the
READ MORE

An Exorcism, Junipero Serra, and the Papal Bulls 1
- federal Indian law
- October 21, 2020
On October 17, 2020, the Archbishop of San Francisco, Salvatore Cordileone, performed an exorcism ceremony outside the San Rafael Church, where protestors had recently toppled a statue of Father Junipero Serra. An exorcism is a ritual conducted to cast out demons and get rid of the influence of the devil, a fallen angel named “Satan.”
READ MORE
Sept. 27th Screening of our Doctrine of Discovery Documentary 1
- federal Indian law
- September 12, 2020
https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcvc-yqrDgpG91BUFfm0ggvv3wdlxg95ftY
READ MORE
The U.S. Government’s Christian Nations Argument in Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States (1955)0
- federal Indian law
- August 27, 2020
Sixty-six years ago, in November of 1954, the U.S. Justice Department submitted a bizarre argument to the Supreme Court in the case Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States. The United States argued that the Tee-Hit-Ton Band of Tlingit Indians in Alaska should not receive monetary compensation for a taking of timber from their Tlingit territory. Why?
READ MORE

ORIGINAL FREE NATIONS